The most used scales () could be the Unfaithfulness Problems Questionnaire (IDQ; Buss ainsi que al

When it comes to dimensions from intimate jealousy, from the forty self-statement products have been reported given that creation of new Care about-Statement and you may Projective Jealousy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Many instruments were utilized only when. , 1992) created to evaluate sex distinctions; this new Multidimensional Jealousy Level (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) developed to evaluate the about three dimensions of jealousy (cognitive, psychological and behavioral size); the fresh Fb Jealousy Scale (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for comparing the probability of a meeting that causes emotions out-of envy users about its craft to the Twitter; the new Envy Scale (Buunk, 1997), regularly look at about three brand of jealousy (activated , stressed and you will preventive) therefore the Social Envy Scale (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and therefore evaluates the fresh bad feeling through genuine or endangered loss regarding a liked individual a rival.

When you look at the Brazil, the fresh Intimate Envy Index try revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) For Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric education from a particular size toward intimate jealousy

On Latin american context, there was an adaptation in Chile of the Inventory of Behavior of your Partners That cause Jealousy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). Inside the Mexico, an excellent Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you will an initial data is carried out with the newest Multidimensional Inventory from Romantic Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). Additionally, earlier training didn’t do Factorial Confirmatory Analysis (CFA) in order to validate the new foundation design discover, and you can low accuracy accounts had been utilized in the circumstances (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or brief trials were used (Mota et al., 2016).

The latest IJS setup to have Mathes and Severa (1981) is one of the most put bills getting contrasting romantic jealousy, they discover half a dozen situations that evaluate the sensitivity to help you threats related to: (a) Partner’s cheating and relationships anyone else (situations step 1, step 3, twelve, fourteen, 15, 16, 20, twenty two, 23, and you may twenty five); (b) Partner’s popularity (things 2, step three, cuatro, seven, ten, 13, 17, 20, and 23); (c) An untrustworthy partner (items 1, cuatro, 6, 19, and you may 21); (d) Lover’s old times (products eleven, twenty four, twenty-six, twenty seven, and you can twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (circumstances 8, 9 and you will twenty-four); and you may (f) Lover’s remaining family members having old schedules and you may gender variations (affairs 5 and you will 18).

All instruments listed above have shown enough degrees of authenticity and you can reliability

You can find five degree that have examined when it comes to their accuracy and you may authenticity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) present a few degree, and also the basic research performed the building of level having 39 situations, that has been reduced to help you twenty eight products after statistical investigation. After that, within the the next data, IJS was utilized near to almost every other bills one to analyzed personal like-links, low self-esteem, self-respect and you will an ad hoc questionnaire from independent identities, confirming, centered on theory, that the excellent away from jealousy, the higher the level of Intimate like together with reduced the brand new separate term of your own partners. Within data, i statement a great coefficient of accuracy out of .92 to your overall scale. Into the a 3rd studies, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and Cock (1982), so you’re able to continue the latest indicators from validity, utilized the IJS and two behavioral strategies: (a) possibility when exposed to a rival and (b) terms off possessiveness towards companion, compliment of a mobile call which they built to the one who participated in the analysis. New requested correlations was indeed gotten, which again offered brand new validity of one’s scale. Finally, inside the a fourth study, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) corroborated new convergent authenticity regarding IJS together with other balances one to analyzed intimate jealousy.